Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here
Start your day in a beautiful way: Subscribe to Aleteia's daily newsletter here.
Sign me up!

Not Prepared to Donate?

Here are 5 ways you can still help Aleteia:

  1. Pray for our team and the success of our mission
  2. Talk about Aleteia in your parish
  3. Share Aleteia content with friends and family
  4. Turn off your ad blockers when you visit
  5. Subscribe to our free newsletter and read us daily
Thank you!
Team Aleteia

Subscribe

Aleteia

Why won’t the Catholic Church ordain women as priests?

Share

The Anglican Church, which has ordained women as priests for many years, recently had a vote on whether to allow the consecration of women as bishops. Why doesn’t the Catholic Church admit women to Holy Orders?

The Catholic Church doesn’t ordain women because the sacrament of Holy Orders was established by Jesus such that “the ordination of women is not possible”. (CCC, 1577)

The Church has offered the following reasons for why the ordination of women is not possible:

(a) Scripture: Jesus was a male and chose only males as his Apostles. The Apostles chose only males as bishops, priests and deacons.
 
(b) Tradition: Both in Magisterial teaching and in practice, the Church – from her earliest days to present – has always imitated Jesus and the Apostles in reserving Holy Orders to males.
 
(c) Theology: A priest is a sacramental sign of Jesus, who is male. In particular, only a male can represent Christ in his capacity as the bridegroom of the Church, his bride.
 
The Church is “bound by this choice made by the Lord himself. For this reason the ordination of women is not possible” (CCC, 1577).
 
The question is not whether the Church should “allow” women to be ordained, but what ordination is in the first place. Since, its very nature, ordination can only be conferred to males, the Church does not “withhold” ordination from women. Even if a bishop were to go through the ordination ritual with a woman, no conferral of Holy Orders would take place.

Isn’t that discrimination?

Regarding whether this could be construed has a kind of discrimination against women, Pope Bl. John Paul II pointed out: “the fact that the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Mother of the Church, received neither the mission proper to the Apostles nor the ministerial priesthood clearly shows that the non-admission of women to priestly ordination cannot mean that women are of lesser dignity, nor can it be construed as discrimination against them. Rather, it is to be seen as the faithful observance of a plan to be ascribed to the wisdom of the Lord of the universe.” (OS, 3)
 
The Church teaches that men and women “are equal as persons and complementary as masculine and feminine” (CCC, 372). The CDF reminds us that “equality is in no way identity, for the Church is a differentiated body, in which each individual has his or her role. The roles are distinct, and must not be confused; they do not favor the superiority of some vis-à-vis the others, nor do they provide an excuse for jealousy; the only better gift, which can and must be desired, is love (1 Cor. 12-13). The greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven are not the ministers but the saints.” (II, 6)
 
Both sexes have an indispensible role in the Church: “The New Testament and the whole history of the Church give ample evidence of the presence in the Church of women, true disciples, witnesses to Christ in the family and in society, as well as in total consecration to the service of God and of the Gospel”(OS, 3). Examples include “the holy martyrs, virgins and mothers of families, who bravely bore witness to their faith and passed on the Church's faith and tradition by bringing up their children in the spirit of the Gospel” (MD, 27). Indeed, “the Church is constantly enriched by the witness of the many women who fulfill their vocation to holiness” (MD, 27).

Not open for debate

In his 1994 Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis on the subject, Pope Bl. John Paul II concluded: “Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church's divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful” (OS, 4).
 
The Church’s teaching, then, is not a matter of policy that can be changed, nor is it open for dispute among the faithful. Rather, in reaffirming that this doctrine is “to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful”, Bl. John Paul II reaffirmed that the doctrine is infallible and irrevocable, thereby binding all Catholics to hold it (CPF, 6, 11). Any Catholic, then, who denies this doctrine “would be in a position of rejecting a truth of Catholic doctrine and would therefore no longer be in full communion with the Catholic Church” (CPF, 6).

Sources
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), paragraphs 372, 1577
Inter Insigniores (II), Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF)
Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (OS), Pope Bl John Paul II
Mulieris Dignitatem (MD), Pope Bl John Paul II
Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio Fidei (CPF), Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF)

* * *

Dr Frederick Marks adds (5/14/2013):

Objection:
Jesus, in choosing only men for the priesthood, was simply following Jewish tradition.  If he were ordaining today, things would be different.
 
Answer
1. Our Lord was anything but a slave to tradition.  He broke with two customs when he asked a Samaritan — and a woman, at that — for water (John 4).  He also urged celibacy on his apostles and dispensed with Jewish ritual when it came to such things as the washing of hands at mealtime (Mt. 19: 12, 29; Lk. 11:38).
 
2. Had Jesus wished to ordain women, he could easily have done so since there were priestesses at the time in Greece, Egypt, and Rome. 
 
3. We read in the Letter to the Hebrews that "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, and today, and forever" (Heb. 13:8).
 
4. Women have actually exercised as much influence as men in the Catholic Church:
 
(a) Mary, who is our model, shunned the spotlight. Nevertheless, she remains the most influential mortal in all of Christian history (save for her son, who was God).  
 
(b) In the United States, no priest or bishop has wielded as much power as Mother Angelica of EWTN fame. 
 
(c) Mother Teresa of Calcutta overshadowed all Church officials of her day save the pope, and John Paul II was surely one of the most charismatic men in the history of the papacy. Who could compete with him?
 
(d) As early as the 12th century, a woman by the name of Catherine of Siena outshone everyone else, male or female, when it came to influence over princes and potentates.
 
(e) Until recently in the West, nuns had a virtual monopoly on the intellectual and moral formation of boys and girls ranging in age from 5 to 14. By the same token, they ran virtually all of the Catholic high schools and colleges for women. Is there any influence comparable to that of the teacher who shapes minds and hearts? And is any group more impressionable than youth?

 

Frederick W. Marks, Ph.D., has written and taught extensively on both Catholicism and American diplomatic history.

Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.
Aleteia offers you this space to comment on articles. This space should always reflect Aleteia values.
[See Comment Policy]
Readers like you contribute to Aleteia's Mission.

Since our inception in 2012, Aleteia’s readership has grown rapidly worldwide. Our team is committed to a mission of providing articles that enrich, inspire and inform a Catholic life. That's why we want our articles to be freely accessible to everyone, but we need your help to do that. Quality journalism has a cost (more than selling ads on Aleteia can cover). That's why readers like you make a major difference by donating as little as $3 a month.