Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Aleteia
Thursday 29 July |
Saint of the Day: Sts Martha, Mary and Lazarus of Bethany
home iconLifestyle
line break icon

Children as Commodities

Guillaume Lemoine

George Weigel - published on 10/23/13

You can't sell human organs, so why in the world should you be able to sell children? Welcome to the continuing expansion of the brave new world of surrogate child-bearing.

The Council of the District of Columbia is considering a bill, sponsored by its most aggressively activist gay member, to legalize surrogate child-bearing in your nation’s capital. Infertility is a heart-rending problem. But solving that problem is not what’s at issue here, for the D.C. surrogacy bill is being pushed by the same people who brought “gay marriage” to the shores of the Potomac River: people who affirm what are, by definition, infertile “marriages.”

Moreover, in their determination to deny reality–or perhaps reinvent it–the proponents of the D.C. surrogacy bill have adopted a species of Newspeak that would make George Orwell cringe. You can get a flavor of it in a letter written by a friend of mine to his D.C. councilman:

“…in reading the bill I was struck that nothing was said about the child to be born out of the surrogate agreement. Much is said about the rights and responsibilities of the ‘gestational carrier’ (a very strange expression) and the ‘intended parent,’ but nothing is said about the child. The child is treated as a thing to be used as the gestational carrier and intended parent wish. This is the most troubling feature of the proposed law. It gives no indication that one is dealing here with a human person who will have feelings, thoughts, and memories. These are all swept aside as though the child to be born will have no interest in how he or she came into the world, who his or her parents are, and all the other things that are so fundamental to our identity as human beings.”

“Gestational carrier”? The D.C. bill not only treats the child as a thing, a commodity that can be bought and sold; it treats the woman bearing the child in the same way. But this is what happens when reality is turned inside-out. For as my friend pointed out to his councilman, it’s illegal to sell human organs in America; so “how…is it possible to sell a baby?”

The day I read my friend’s plea to the D.C. Council for moral sanity, I happened upon Anthony Esolen’s report of another horror involving children, this time in Toronto:

“A public school teacher in Toronto has written a set of lessons requiring young children to imagine wearing clothes appropriate for the opposite sex. He’s been congratulated, not by wary parents, but by a school board that insists that teachers are ‘co-parents.’ What he’s doing, of course, is subjecting naïve children to an exercise that promotes his own sexual aims.”

There is deep and disturbing cultural irony here. An America that prides itself on organizations like the Children’s Defense Fund and that supports charities like the Save the Children Fund and UNICEF has also committed itself, not indefinitely we pray, to a regime of abortion on demand that has led to the deaths of tens of millions of children. The highest local legislative body in the federal capital is considering a bill that would commodify children as fit objects for sale and purchase–which is precisely what happened in Washington’s antebellum slave markets. And up north, in the Land of Nice, children are being compelled to imagine themselves as cross-dressers; don’t be surprised when it happens south of the 49th parallel.

Democracy cannot long co-exist with decadence or unreality. That’s the lesson of history and sound political philosophy. And it’s the message of the Church, which, with John Paul II, teaches us that it takes a certain kind of people, living certain virtues, to make free politics (and the free economy) work. However we may describe those people and the virtues they live out, they aren’t people who buy and sell children, speak blithely of “gestational carriers,” reduce parenthood to a lifestyle choice, and ask youngsters to imagine themselves cross-dressing. These behaviors aren’t just weird; they’re wicked, and the attempt to force them on society through the law is a perfect example of what Benedict XVI meant by the “dictatorship of relativism.” 

Tags:
FamilyMarriageParenting
Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read Aleteia.org every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in seven languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...




Top 10
1
ORGAN
J-P Mauro
Reconstructing a 12th-century pipe organ discovered in the Holy L...
2
HIDILYN DIAZ
Cerith Gardiner
Gold-winning Filipina Olympian shares her Miraculous Medal for th...
3
Zelda Caldwell
World-record winning gymnast Simone Biles leans on her Catholic f...
4
Joachim and Anne
Philip Kosloski
Did Jesus know his grandparents?
5
PRINCESS DIANA AND MOTHER TERESA
Mathilde De Robien
Did you know Princess Di was buried with a rosary?
6
morning
Philip Kosloski
This morning prayer is easy to memorize
7
SAINT ANTHONY OF PADUA
Philip Kosloski
This prayer to St. Anthony is said to have “never been know...
See More
Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.