No, Pope Francis hasn’t thrown out the Catechism. Yes, the press has sometimes misrepresents him, but we should be glad Francis is out there engaging the world.
On November 9, the New York Times published an article, “Conservative U.S. Catholics Feel Left Out of the Pope’s Embrace.” In it, the Times introduced us to Bridget Kurt, a hospice community director from Smyrna, Georgia, “a regular attender of Mass, a longtime stalwart in her church’s anti-abortion movement and a believer that all the church’s doctrines are true and beautiful and should be obeyed.” Ms. Kurt, however, is unhappy with Pope Francis. The Times reports that she recently took her Pope Francis prayer card and threw it away. Why?
The Times expanded:
Did you catch, by the way, that description? Some Catholics in the Church’s “conservative wing”? As if the Church were the U.S. Congress – an unwieldy collection of conservatives, liberals, progressives and tea-partiers. As if the Church had “wings” and “caucuses” and “factions.” As if the Church were a political body.
Anyway… the Times goes on to quote disgruntled Catholic blogger Steve Skojec:
I believe Mr. Skojec, Ms. Kurt, and anyone else disgruntled by Pope Francis would do well to read this blog post by Father John Zuhlsdorf. “Context, friends, context,” Father Zuhlsdorf urges his unhappy-with-Francis friends as he tries to talk them down from the ledge. It can’t be said enough: Pope Francis likes to speak off the cuff, from the heart, and so precision sometimes suffers. But what is gained is far more valuable: triage for a soldier lying wounded on the battlefield.
This line from St. Augustine is often quoted: “Love, and do what you will.” Imagine what you could do with that line out of its proper context. But does anyone think Augustine was a free love advocate?
Here at Aleteia, we’ve also been urging the importance of context. Here’s a piece of mine on Francis’s controversial interview with La Civiltà Cattolica.
And here’s a piece by Katie van Schaijik, “We Should Mind Our Own Beeswax and Let the Pope Be Pope.”
This piece by Russell Shaw is also helpful.
Those co-opting the pope’s message would also do well to read these posts. For part of what some Catholics are wigging out about is the way in which Francis’s statements are being used to undermine Church teaching. Such as in this Huffington Post piece celebrating the pope’s supposed stance on gays.
Should we be surprised when people possessing little-to-no formation in the Church’s doctrine take Pope Francis’s pronouncements and run with them? I think not.
And for the record, here is the full context of Francis’s “Who am I to judge?” remark about gays:
“A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person.”
So clearly, Francis is not intending to throw out the Catechism. This means that he is not going to condemn those with a homosexual inclination who, with a “good will,” are not acting upon it. Nor is he going to condemn an active homosexual sincerely seeking God. He’s not going to approve of the person’s actions; but he is going to love that person and do his best to help that person use his freedom to live in the fullness of the truth.
But should Francis be blamed for the “confusion” his statements cause, even if they do make more sense in context?
I don’t think so. I would rather have him speaking off the cuff and surprising the world.
Francis is not a relativist. Francis is not trying to overthrow the Church’s teaching. Francis is not giving up on bringing atheists to Christ. Rather, he’s trying to make the Gospel alive again to an age that has consigned it to the graveyard of history.
I’ll end with the words of Alexandra P. Shattuck, director of a crisis pregnancy center in Hapeville, Georgia, who was also quoted in the Times piece. Regarding Francis’s statements about abortion in the interview with La Civiltà Cattolica that caused such a flap, Ms. Shattuck “said she had studied the pope’s interview in her parish’s Bible study class and concluded that the news media had taken Francis’ warning not to ‘obsess’ about abortion out of context. She said he was really trying to teach about mercy.” She added:
“I think [Pope Francis] was completely right. … The focus should be not only on love and mercy, but on treating the women in these crisis situations with love and mercy.”
Wise words that the wigging out would well ponder.
If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.
Here are some numbers:
- 20 million users around the world read Aleteia.org every month
- Aleteia is published every day in eight languages: English, French, Arabic, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
- Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
- Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
- Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
- We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)
As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.
Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!