Aleteia logoAleteia logoAleteia
Friday 31 March |
Saint of the Day: Bl. Natalia Tułasiewicz
Aleteia logo
separateurCreated with Sketch.

The Old Lady who Swallowed a Fly

The Old Lady who Swallowed a Fly Gido


Kathy Schiffer - published on 07/24/14

The law of unintended consequences reaches far and wide; even “the Pill” isn’t exempt.

Need an idea for Lenten almsgiving?

Help us spread faith on the internet. Would you consider donating just $10, so we can continue creating free, uplifting content?

Make a Lenten donation here

Do you remember the silly children’s song about the old lady who swallowed the fly? The poor, misguided woman tried again and again to rid herself of her problem, by swallowing bigger and bigger things—a spider, a bird, a cat, a dog, a goat, a cow, and finally a horse—and she’s dead, of course!

The law of unintended consequences, popularized in the 20th century by American sociologist Robert Merton, is like that. Someone does something, no doubt with the best of intentions, but the plan blows up in his face because he fails to imagine all the things that could go wrong.

The Kudzu Lesson

In the southeastern United States, kudzu is a case in point. Kudzu (genus Pueraria lobata) was brought to the U.S. from Japan in 1876 as an ornamental plant. Later kudzu was used to prevent soil erosion; but without its natural enemies, it has grown like the man-eating plant in the 1960 cult film “Little Shop of Horrors.” Growing as much as a foot a day, kudzu was declared a weed in 1971 when officials recognized the vine’s propensity for overtaking parklands, climbing telephone poles, all but obliterating fences, and smothering all in their range.

Digital Billboards

Another, more recent threat to the American landscape would seem to be that newest example of technological highway blight, the digital billboard. You’d think we’d have learned back in the ‘60s, when the Highway Beautification Act was signed into law. By the mid-60s, when the government belatedly realized that we had a problem, unregulated billboards had usurped the view along most of America’s roads, vying for drivers’ attention, both a safety hazard and a blight.

But regulation is most frequently done after the fact. Who would have guessed, for example, that road warriors with pulsating boom boxes in the rear would also install custom purple fluorescent lights beneath their vans, shining downward onto the road, wreaking havoc for the other drivers?

The newfangled digital billboards seem to me to be destined for after-the-fact regulation. The primary objective of the flashing, pulsing, gyrating signs, of course, is to cause drivers to look away from the road; and it’s only a matter of time before the incidence of accidents near these neon hazards brings about increased regulation. Problem is, the billboards are darned expensive, and banning them will mean major financial hardship for sign companies and advertisers alike.

The Birth Control Pill

Today’s final example of technology-run-amok is that bulwark of American social freedom, the oral contraceptive. Approved by the FDA in the early 1960s, “the Pill” was far more effective than most previous methods of birth control. With its use, women had unprecedented (but by no means sure-fire) control over their fertility. Soon after the birth control pill was approved for sale, there was a sharp increase in college attendance and graduation rates for women. The ability to control fertility without sacrificing sexual relationships allowed women to make long term educational and career plans.

But not all the news was good news. The Pill has had an enormous impact on individuals and on society as a whole:

Moral Consequences – Pre-marital Sex and Promiscuity. Never before had sexual activity been so divorced from reproduction. For a couple using the Pill, intercourse became purely an expression of love, or a means of physical pleasure, or both; but it was no longer a means of reproduction. “If it feels good, do it” became the mantra of the tumultuous sexual revolution. The spread of oral contraceptive use thus led many religious figures and institutions to debate the proper role of sexuality and its relationship to procreation. The Roman Catholic Church in particular, after studying the phenomenon of oral contraceptives, re-emphasized the stated teaching on birth control in the 1968 papal encyclical “
Humanae Vitae” (On the Regulation of Birth). The encyclical reiterated the constant Catholic teaching that artificial contraception distorts the nature and purpose of sex.

Ethical Consequences – The Pill as Abortifacient. If you’re pro-life, as I am, you believe that deliberately killing a child in the womb is a grave wrong. But one of the ways that the birth control pill works is just that. The use of combined oral contraceptives atrophies the uterine lining, preventing the proliferation of vascular tissue needed for a newly-conceived embryo to implant. The inability to implant and access nutrition from the mother results in the death of the week-old human embryo.

Health Consequences – Link to Breast Cancer. As the Pill increasingly became the method of choice for women choosing to delay or avoid pregnancy, researchers began to identify a problem:  women who used hormonal contraceptives began to show higher than average rates of breast cancer, and possibly increases in other cancers, as well. Whereas feminists had originally hailed the Pill as an “equalizer” that gave them the same sexual freedom enjoyed by men, this new development caused many of them to denounce oral contraceptives as a male invention designed to facilitate male sexual freedom at the cost of health risks to women.

Environmental Consequences – Where Are the Macho Fish? In our environmentally-conscious society, it is perhaps this last complex of problems that will have the greatest impact on consumer attitudes toward the Pill. The estrogen consumed by women in the form of contraceptive pills, patches and rings doesn’t just disappear. Estrogen is excreted in urine and enters rivers and groundwater wherever sewage ends up. It is non-biodegradable so water treatment plants are powerless to remove it from water (including our drinking water). Fish and wildlife ingest estrogen in the water. The phenomenon of ambiguously-sexed fish is widespread and well-reported. Like the canary in the mine, these genetically impaired fish in waters contaminated with estrogen sound an alarm to environmentalists.

Social Consequences – Do You Love Me? In the days before the oral contraceptive, a couple understood fertility to be an integral part of their identity. Reaching that depth of love in which the man and woman choose to devote their lives to one another, they decide to marry. With confidence in the spouse’s life-long love and commitment, the woman freely enters into a one-flesh union with her beloved; and should God choose, this physical symbol of love and unity may result in the ultimate gift of self: the embodiment of love in the creation of another person.  

But without this depth of commitment, many women now engage in sex just to “hold onto” the man, or simply for physical pleasure. But we are created for authentic love, and there will always be that nagging question after nonmarital sex: Does he really love me?

Kathy Schifferis a freelance writer and speaker, and her blog Seasons of Grace can be found on the Catholic Portal at Patheos.  

Support Aleteia!

Enjoying your time on Aleteia?

Articles like these are sponsored free for every Catholic through the support of generous readers just like you.

Thanks to their partnership in our mission, we reach more than 20 million unique users per month!

Help us continue to bring the Gospel to people everywhere through uplifting and transformative Catholic news, stories, spirituality, and more.

Support Aleteia with a gift today!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...

Entrust your prayer intentions to our network of monasteries

Top 10
See More
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.