Is a Hollywood contract up next?
In the month since Fort Lauderdale’s new ordinance took effect, banning mass outdoor feedings (without first obtaining the property owners’ permission and providing outdoor toilets nearby), Arnold “Bud” Abbott – the 90-year-old Fort Lauderdale Good Samaritan – has resolutely continued feeding the homeless at a beachfront park and other locations. For his defiant charity, he’s now received a total of five citations (each carrying a fine of up to $500 and up to 60 days in jail). The ordinance limits homeless feedings to locations with bathroom facilities, places for washing hands and a way to keep hot foods hot and cold foods cold to prevent contamination.
After an eventful several weeks (more about that below), Abbott’s court appearance Wednesday at an arraignment hearing was a bit anticlimactic. Broward Circuit Court Judge Thomas Lynch ruled that the ordinance would be stayed for 30 days – with no further citations or arrests for mass outdoor feedings – to give Mr. Abbott and Mayor Jack Seiler time to reach an accommodation through mediation. Formal charges will not be filed against Mr. Abbott unless mediation fails or hell freezes over.
With the massive worldwide outpouring of sympathy for this aged WWII vet who “wants only to feed the hungry,” there is no way Mayor Seiler – already outmaneuvered by the Abbott publicity machine and smarting from being called fascistic, his city government the victim of an “Anonymous” cyber-attack and the convention and tourist industry threatened – will permit Abbott to spend one nanosecond in jail.
The Mayor has repeatedly expressed his willingness to meet with Abbott and try to reach an end to nearly two decades of testy confrontations between Abbott and the City of Fort Lauderdale, although Seiler has remained firm in support of the ordinance as a necessary public health measure.
"Miami Herald" columnist Fred Grimm provides a revealing look into their long and contentious history. Grimm recalls his earliest encounter with the results of “Bud” Arnold’s advocacy for the homeless. Fourteen years ago, Arnold’s lawyers has just won a circuit court ruling that a Fort Lauderdale zoning ordinance keeping him from feeding the homeless in the city’s parks violated a state law protecting religious activity:
No, no. Not dead exactly. Just dead drunk. Like the other five winos who had arrayed themselves in similar repose around the toddler playground, all summoned there by God, or rather his local stand-in, Bud Abbott, to test my liberal sensibilities.
Bud and his feeding crew quickly showed up at the city’s beachfront park, dishing out free meals … But with my kid in tow, my sour perspective was that the saintly Abbott’s mission seemed more provocative than godly. The guy over there peeing on a palm tree didn’t help.
Grimm writes of the tension in many communities “between the individual rights and needs of itinerants and a tourist-dependent community’s right to control the safety, sanitation and aesthetics of parks, beaches and public plazas” and illustrates his point with another anecdote:
Parents raised hell until the city finally erected a large tent (designed for wedding receptions) at the western edge of the park to serve as a shelter. …
The tent sheltered an amalgam of old drunks and young men on binges of alcohol and bad luck, druggies, cross-country drifters, the freshly down-and-out. It became rife with drugs and cheap booze and prostitution and violence. There was at least one murder, several stabbings.