Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Sunday 19 September |
Our Lady of La Salette
home iconNews
line break icon

‘Star Trek’ Actor Patrick Stewart Sides with Christian Bakers in Gay Cake Flap

Jordan Strauss/Invision

Kirsten Andersen - published on 06/08/15 - updated on 06/08/17

"Captain Picard" stuns free speech opponents with logic, not phasers

Star Trek: The Next Generation‘s Captain Jean-Luc Picard was known throughout the galaxy for his level head, fair mind, and diplomatic skill.  Last week, it became apparent he may have borrowed those traits from the actor who portrayed him, as Sir Patrick Stewart took on an issue far stickier than any interstellar debate Picard had to face.

Stewart ruffled feathers last Friday by telling a BBC news program that he supported the Christian owners of a Northern Ireland bakery in their fight against the UK government over gay-themed cake. Colin and Karen McArthur, owners of the Ashers Baking Company, were convicted last week of discrimination and ordered to pay a fine equivalent to US $765 for refusing to decorate a cake with the words "Support Gay Marriage" above an image of Bert and Ernie, two characters from the PBS children’s show Sesame Street

Stewart, a longtime activist for LGBT acceptance and gay marriage, said that no matter how strongly he believes in a cause, he supports the rights of others to disagree.  He said the government’s attempt to force the bakers to decorate a cake with words that violate their deeply held beliefs was wrong.

“You’ve picked a deliciously difficult subject because, finally, I found myself on the side of the bakers,” Stewart told the BBC. “It was not because this was a gay couple that they objected. It was not because they were going to be celebrating some kind of marriage or agreement between them. It was the actual words on the cake that they objected to.  They found them offensive.”

“I would support their right to say ‘no, this is personally offensive to my beliefs and I will not do it,’" Stewart said, adding that, "I felt bad for them that it cost them 600 quid or whatever.”

The reaction from gay activists online and elsewhere was — to borrow a line from another Star Trek icon — "Fascinating."  Normally, the automatic response to a statement like Stewart’s is to personally attack the speaker as a bigoted homophobe.  But Stewart is constantly photographed with his gay best friend, and has been a vocal supporter of the fight to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples.  Clearly, he was not speaking from a place of hatred for homosexuals.

With their default ad hominem attack strategy taken away from them, LGBT activists were left to grapple with the content of Stewart’s words, rather than dig deep for any mud they could sling in his direction.  The result was a rather lukewarm chastisement that not surprisingly, made very little logical sense.  (Spock would surely not approve.)  

While most of Stewart’s LGBT critics admitted that they themselves would not like to be forced to decorate a cake with an anti-gay marriage theme, when asked how they could oppose giving Christians the same freedom to refuse, they largely responded, "That’s different."  Gays, they argued, are a "protected class" and must be accomodated no matter what.  When reminded that religious believers are also a protected class, they said that that regardless of what the McArthurs believe, they’ve chosen to do business in the public square, and must check their beliefs at the door.

All of this is familiar territory.  In the US, the Supreme Court has sided with religious believers, ruling that closely held corporations can abide by the tenets of their owners’ belief systems.  In the case of the Northern Irish bakery, the UK courts have so far ruled differently (the McArthurs intend to appeal).  But what is unfamiliar, and refreshing, is the way Stewart was able to cut through the noise and make his words heard.  Overwhelmingly, even his opponents have been civil in their criticism.  What’s more, masses of people who might have otherwise been distracted from his message by the ad hominem approach were able to objectively evaluate his words — and found that they agreed with them.

  • 1
  • 2
HomosexualityReligious Freedom

Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in seven languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...

Top 10
Kathleen N. Hattrup
Pope considers what to do with pro-abortion Catholic politicians
Esteban Pittaro
Argentine “Mother Teresa” was a former model and actress who embr...
Berthe and Marcel
Lauriane Vofo Kana
This couple has the longest marriage in France
Philip Kosloski
Your body is not a “shell” for your spirit
Kathleen N. Hattrup
On same-sex unions, Pope says Church doesn’t have power to change...
Mathilde De Robien
How a lost masterpiece of sacred art was discovered thanks to chi...
Philip Kosloski
How receiving Holy Communion can drive away demons
See More
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.