Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Aleteia
Thursday 26 November |
Saint Leonard of Port Maurice
home iconNews
line break icon

Planned Parenthood's Absolute Corruption

thomas-hawk-cc

David Mills - published on 08/04/15

The abortion industry behaves like the entrenched power it is

I have my doubts that the Planned Parenthood videos will change the culture and the law as much as we hope. Perhaps enough people in the partly pro-life, partly pro-choice middle will be shocked into realizing what it is that they’ve tolerated and begin working to defend the unborn, but I’m not betting on it. I feel bad to be speaking so pessimistically, but if we are to take full advantage of the public revelations we’ll have for a few more weeks, we need to know who has power and how they’ll use it.

Abortionism is an entrenched industry, from which a lot of people profit. It has the advantage of having not only the lobbyists every other large business has but ideological lobbyists as well. Tens if not hundreds of thousands of them, energetic, convinced, unpaid, and utterly committed to the business. A lot of them also hold office in the Democratic party, starting with the president and all but two Democratic senators.

Worse, it’s a culturally necessary industry. A sexualized society like ours, whose cultural ideal is frequent sex without consequences, must make abortion readily available. No matter what precautions people take, when they have sex, sometimes they will find themselves with child. A child they don’t want or feel they can’t have. Abortion’s part of the cultural infrastructure, as fundamental to what we do as the interstate highway system.

But still the pro-choice apologists rally. The borders of their kingdom remain secure, but they start shelling the other army just in case. As usual, they’ve tried to divert attention away from the issue at hand. They’ve gone on the offensive with the claim that pro-lifers don’t care about born children. It’s a “gotcha!” kind of argument that appears whenever the abortion regime seems threatened.

The point is usually made simple-mindedly, as by Sister Joan Chittister, O.S.B., quoted a few days ago by the Daily Kos:

I do not believe that just because you’re opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a   
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don’t? Because you don’t want any tax money to go there. That’s not pro-life. That’s pro-birth.

One could say four things about this.

First, it says that unless you’re an economic liberal, which is to say a Democrat, you don’t really care about children. You don’t want the child fed, educated, or housed. You apparently want him starving, ignorant, and living in a cardboard box. One can be far from a libertarian and think the question of what policies will create the greatest wealth, justice, and equality requires a better answer than “tax money.”

People like Sister Joan should see, because it’s an easy point to see, that disagreement with their politics doesn’t in any way suggest a lack of compassion for poor children. They can be wrong in their politics and still care deeply about children.

Second, it doesn’t touch the pro-life argument. It’s obviously meant as a rebuttal, but it’s more like pulling the fire alarm when you realize you’re failing the final exam. It diverts attention from the issue. The first task is to save the child’s life. Saving his life doesn’t require you to take care of him afterwards. You may get a homeless man off the tracks before the subway train comes but no one expects you to bring him home. Undoubtedly, almost all of us could do more for the mothers and their children, and for everyone else in need, but caring for the child starts with saving his life.

Third, it’s not true anyway, as the Catholic theologian Charles Camosy wrote on Facebook, in response to an article by Damon Linker. “First of all,” he wrote, “it’s an absolute and shocking canard that pro-lifers don’t do anything to lower the abortion rate outside of trying to make abortion illegal. They are the ones adopting children (and, indeed, running adoption agencies), running pregnancy help centers (think about Sisters of Life, et al), pushing for adoption tax credits, etc. Could we do more? Absolutely. Is your overarching premise false? Absolutely.”

Fourth, and I think most important at the moment, it’s not the wisest argument for the pro-choicer to offer. Any argument that begins with “Just look at you!” invites the response “Well, look at you!” If the moral condition of the pro-lifers is relevant, so is the pro-choicers’. One can ask them if they’ve had an abortion, or urged their girlfriend or wife to abort their child, or helped a friend abort her child, or have lived a sexual life which required the possibility of aborting an “unwanted pregnancy.”

They should disclose their self-interest in winning the debate, for one thing. That’s just fair. For another, we should know about the acts that have formed their character which has formed their minds. One reason so many people deny the unborn child’s right to live is their own complicity. It would be best for them, and for the public debate, if they were honest about it.

This is the tricky point, because the pro-life movement has spoken so long and so earnestly about respect and dialogue. But having an abortion, or paying for an abortion, or performing an abortion will change you. Some pro-lifers I know have been shocked at the casual, banality-of-evil way Planned Parenthood’s officers speak of the child in these videos.

They shouldn’t have been. The professionalized, routinized, commercialized killing of unborn children, day after day, paycheck after paycheck, for years on end, corrupts. It’s an absolute power that corrupts absolutely.


David Mills, 
former executive editor of  First Things
, is a senior editor of 
The Stream , editorial director for  
Ethika Politika
 and columnist for several Catholic publications. His latest book is 
Discovering Mary.
Follow him @DavidMillsWrtng.

*For a response to Garry Wills’ attack on pro-life Evangelicals, which takes up other standard pro-choice arguments, see here.

Tags:
AbortionPlanned ParenthoodPro-life
Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read Aleteia.org every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in eight languages: English, French, Arabic, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...




Top 10
LUXOR FILM FESTIVAL
Zoe Romanowsky
20-year-old filmmaker wins award for powerful...
Luz Ivonne Ream
What’s the secret of this couple’s 64 years o...
PADRE PIO
Philip Kosloski
Padre Pio's favorite prayer of petition
CHRIST THE KING
Edifa
Why do we say that "Christ is King"?
CHRISTMAS AD
Cerith Gardiner
This heartwarming TV ad focuses on what reall...
Cerith Gardiner
This Irish blessing is what we all need to he...
Zelda Caldwell
SpaceX’s ‘Resilience’ commanded by astronaut ...
See More
Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.