Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Saturday 18 September |
Saint of the Day: Bl. Daudi Okelo and Bl. Jildo Irwa
home iconArt & Culture
line break icon

Why British English refuses to take itself seriously

CC Public Domain

Zelda Caldwell - published on 06/26/17

Silly terms like gobsmacked, codswallop, and balderdash reflect the British people's sense of humor.

When British comedian James Corden began hosting his late-night television show in the United States, he reportedly had to watch his words – his producers told him that  American audiences would be baffled by expressions like “knackered” (tired and exhausted”) or “dodgy” (dishonest).

These Britishisms, along with words and expressions like gobsmacked, codswallop, balderdash, sticky wicket, and gazump, seem like nonsense to the speaker of “standard” English. What’s with all silly talk, one might ask?

In a wonderful article for, Christine Ro explains why “British English is full of silly-sounding words.” It’s because it’s meant to be. Whimsically playful words and expressions reflect a national “ban on earnestness” or “an aversion to taking things to seriously,” Ro writes. And silly words are an outward expression of the British people’s cast-iron defense against earnestness: its sense of humor, “a sense of humor of a particular kind: given to irony and understatement.”

A playful inventiveness runs strong among British writers, and has for centuries. Shakespeare himself loved to make up words (he gave us bedazzled, gloomy, sanctimonious and gossip). Ro writes that after the Bard of Avon, “British writers from Charles Dickens (‘whiz-bang’) and Lewis Carroll (‘mimsy’) to JK Rowling (‘muggle’) have continued to enliven English vocabulary.”

Read more:
We are all quoting Shakespeare, even if unwittingly

But to call these words “silly” may sell the British short. Ro explains that there is a method to the barminess:

“Whimsical words like these are formed in a number of ways. These include blends of other words (eg ‘Oxbridge’, from Oxford and Cambridge); reduplicatives, which repeat sounds or parts of words (‘higgledy-piggledy’); back-formations, which often remove the suffix of their originating word (like ‘kempt’, from ‘unkempt’); and of course sheer nonsense (like Roald Dahl’s invention ‘gobblefunk’).”

Read the entire article here. It really is the bee’s knees. Bob’s your uncle.

Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in seven languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...

Top 10
Kathleen N. Hattrup
Pope considers what to do with pro-abortion Catholic politicians
Philip Kosloski
How receiving Holy Communion can drive away demons
Berthe and Marcel
Lauriane Vofo Kana
This couple has the longest marriage in France
Philip Kosloski
Why is the feast of the Holy Cross celebrated on September 14?
Mathilde De Robien
How a lost masterpiece of sacred art was discovered thanks to chi...
Kathleen N. Hattrup
On same-sex unions, Pope says Church doesn’t have power to change...
Philip Kosloski
This prayer to St. Anthony is said to have “never been known to f...
See More
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.