Not Prepared to Donate?

Here are 5 ways you can still help Aleteia:

  1. Pray for our team and the success of our mission
  2. Talk about Aleteia in your parish
  3. Share Aleteia content with friends and family
  4. Turn off your ad blockers when you visit
  5. Subscribe to our free newsletter and read us daily
Thank you!
Team Aleteia

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here

Welcome to Aleteia

we pronounce it \ ă-lә-`tay-uh \
The world’s leading Catholic Internet site.
Launched with the blessing and encouragement of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Communication, Aleteia provides a new kind of journalism, with a well-tempered Catholic perspective on today’s news, culture, inspiring stories and evangelization.
Aleteia

Google sued over the “right to be forgotten”

PHONE SCREEN,GOOGLE
Nuttapol Sn | Shutterstock
Share

Thanks to an EU court ruling, for some, what happens on the internet now doesn't need to stay on the internet.

In 2014 the European court ruled that people have the “right to be forgotten,” a landmark ruling that allowed European citizens to request that their personal information be “delisted” from search results. The majority of requests have come from private individuals, minors, corporate entities, politicians, and celebrities. Google has now taken on the tiresome task of answering each individual request.

For their part, Google must do their best to vet each case and make a fair decision based on the court ruling and what (or whom) it is still in the public’s best interest to keep searchable. This decision can be based on a wide range of factors, including whether the individual is private or a public figure, whether the information is personal or professional, criminal activity, and what kind of website the information appears on.

The requester then must present Google with explanations for how each link relates to them and why their searchability result is “irrelevant, outdated, or otherwise inappropriate.” Business Standard has a Google spokeswoman’s comment of the process:

“We work hard to comply with the right to be forgotten, but we take great care not to remove search results that are clearly in the public interest and will defend the public’s right to access lawful information,” a Google spokeswoman said.

However, problems have arisen when rejected requesters don’t agree with Google’s decision. Two of these rejected parties have taken Google to the highest EU court in order to force the tech giant’s hand. The cases are not linked but they both are seeking to remove information about past convictions. Both parties have served their time and believe that the public’s access to this information prevents them from properly rejoining society.

Pages: 1 2

Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.
Aleteia offers you this space to comment on articles. This space should always reflect Aleteia values.
[See Comment Policy]