Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Aleteia
Saturday 15 May |
Saint of the Day: St. Isidore the Farmer
home iconArt & Culture
line break icon

New study raises questions about the age of the Shroud of Turin

shroud of turin

Wikipedia

Zelda Caldwell - published on 05/07/18

Scientists challenge previous radiocarbon testing that dated the Jesus’ burial cloth to the Middle Ages.

The Shroud of Turin, which is believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ, has long been the subject of a debate that has pitted those who believe it is the actual cloth in which Joseph of Arimathea wrapped the body of Jesus Christ against those who think that the Shroud was an invention of the Middle Ages.

For the doubters, a radiocarbon analysis conducted in 1988 by scientists from Oxford University, the University of Arizona and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology settled the question. After testing samples of the shroud, they estimated that the cloth dated to sometime between 1260 and 1390.

Today that testing is being called into question, according to a report in Vatican Insider News.

Scientists are expected to present evidence challenging the reliability of the 30-year-old testing at this week’s meeting of the International Center of Sindonology in Chambéry, France.

According to Vatican Insider News, scientists will challenge the 1988 findings, based on the following findings:

1. Questions about the reliability of testing fabrics

Paolo Di Lazzaro, research manager of the Aeneas of Frascati, found  that “the calculation that transforms the number of C-14 atoms in the age of a fabric” presents “greater uncertainties than in other solid samples (bones, artifacts, etc.) because of the greater permeability of the textile sample to external agents (bacterial digestion, mold, dirt).”

2. Questions about laboratory procedures

The reliability of the data is in question, Di Lazzaro explains, because the three laboratories that dated the Shroud 30 years ago “have always refused to provide the exact distribution of raw data.”

 3. Evidence that contamination may have distorted results

Previous tests showed that different samples of the cloth produced different results, indicating the possible presence of contamination.

Tags:
ArchaeologyJesus ChristShroud of Turin
Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read Aleteia.org every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in seven languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...




Top 10
1
Eric Clapton, Luciano Pavarotti, East London Gospel Choir
J-P Mauro
Hear Clapton and Pavarotti sing a prayer to the “Holy Mothe...
2
ascension AND ASSUMPTION
Philip Kosloski
Ascension vs. assumption: What is the difference?
3
ZMARTWYCHWSTANIE
Philip Kosloski
What happened between the resurrection and ascension of Jesus?
4
I.Media for Aleteia
These 30 shrines will lead the Rosary Relay for end of the pandem...
5
PHILIPPINES CHURCH
J-P Mauro
We need better church music, say Catholics in the Philippines
6
Philip Kosloski
What was the message of Our Lady of Fatima?
7
BENOIT JOSEPH LABRE
Larry Peterson
Benedict XVI called him “one of the most unusual saintsR...
See More
Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.