Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here

More from Aleteia

Not Prepared to Donate?

Here are 5 ways you can still help Aleteia:

  1. Pray for our team and the success of our mission
  2. Talk about Aleteia in your parish
  3. Share Aleteia content with friends and family
  4. Turn off your ad blockers when you visit
  5. Subscribe to our free newsletter and read us daily
Thank you!
Team Aleteia

Subscribe

Aleteia

Study finds that seeing the same doctor every time may save your life

MEDICINE
IJeab - Shutterstock
Share

In today's health care system "continuity of care", while difficult to achieve, is linked to lower mortality rates and other positive health outcomes.

Researchers in the United Kingdom have found evidence that patients who keep seeing the same physician across time every time they seek care have a lower mortality rate. The findings strongly suggest the literally vital importance of doctors and patients building up a relationship over time.

A genuine bond with their doctors, the researchers suggests, makes patients feel comfortable to reveal non-strictly medical aspects of their lives that nonetheless may affect their health; and this enables physicians to make ever more informed decisions in providing holistic, comprehensive care.

Earlier research, reported The Guardian, had already shown that what’s known as “continuity of care” is linked to patients better following medical directives, a better uptake of vaccines and fewer visits to the emergency room. Now the quality of the doctor-patient relationship is shown to affect the patients’ death rate.

In our hi-tech era, it is still the human factor that counts, stressed one of the researchers, Sir Denis Pereira Gray, who worked with a team of scholars from the Universities of Exeter and Manchester in the United Kingdom. Gray told The Guardian: “Basically we are saying that at a time when the emphasis in the reports in the press are all about new machines and new technology, that [this research] shows the human side of medicine is still very important and even a matter of life and death.”

Professor Philip Evans of the University of the University of Exeter Medical School, defined continuity of care as that what “happens when a patient and a doctor see each other repeatedly and get to know each other over time.” Such a relationship,” he told the BBC, “leads to be better communication, patient satisfaction, adherence to medical advice and much lower use of hospital services.”

The researchers reviewed findings of 22 studies in nine countries, including the US, the UK, South Korea and Israel. Results also suggested the importance of patients’ connections with surgeons and other specialists, including psychiatrists, with one study showing that colorectal surgery patients were twice as likely to die within the year if they had a different surgeon when they were readmitted.

Of course, in the US as in other nations, even privately insured patients might find it challenging to gain access to the same providers each time they need medical help, particularly when it comes to specialists, such as surgeons. For America’s poor relying on Medicaid as traditionally administered, the chances for continuity of care have been practically nil.

Prone to waste and fraud, the system has been labyrinthine, to put it mildly, with patients routinely challenged to find a doctor, any doctor, in the first place. The traditional formula is also transaction-based, with physicians logging office visits and tests administered, without a clear roadmap to providing patients with consistent, holistic care—care that takes into account not just medical issues but that is also alert to the social determinants of health. These include housing, employment, education and other factors—such as mental and emotional conditions—that often have a major impact on a person’s health.

The non-medical dimensions of a patient’s life are precisely those that, as the UK study suggests, are gradually revealed as a doctor-patient relationship develops over time. In fact, the British findings offer an endorsement of a unique Medicaid experiment in New York State currently in the fourth year of a five-year mandate, the Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment program (DSRIP).

DSRIP is an example of Value-Based Care, as the program financially rewards physicians whose patients have better health outcomes over the longer term; it is a potent example of Value-Based Care, a program that puts patients and their interests at the very heart of health-care reform. Primary Care Physicians and other providers are no longer paid according to the number of office visits or tests administered—but based on how well patients are doing over time.

That long-term wellness, again, depends on the provision of care that takes the whole person into account, the medical, mental, cultural and social factors that determine a person’s wellbeing. And at the heart of this process is the quality of the doctor-patient relationship.

Mario Paredes is CEO of SOMOS Community Care, Inc., one of 25 Performing Provider Systems operating under the mandate of New York State’s Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.
Aleteia offers you this space to comment on articles. This space should always reflect Aleteia values.
[See Comment Policy]

Attention parish leaders!

Join our newsletter exclusively for parish ministers and staffers to help you reach your parishioners.
Learn More