Aleteia logoAleteia logoAleteia
Wednesday 31 May |
The Feast of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Aleteia logo
separateurCreated with Sketch.

Supreme Court leaves in place Kentucky law requiring doctors to describe ultrasound


By Konstantin L | Shutterstock

Zelda Caldwell - published on 12/09/19

The ACLU argued that the law violated the doctors’ freedom of speech.

What can God do in your life with one Bible verse a day?
Subscribe to Aleteia's new service and bring Scripture into your morning:
Just one verse each day.
Click to bring God's word to your inbox

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge to a Kentucky law that requires doctors to describe ultrasounds to those seeking abortions. The refusal to hear the case, leaves the law in place.

The law, which was enacted in 2017, requires doctors in Kentucky to perform an ultrasound before giving informed consent to a patient seeking an abortion. Under the law, physicians are required to describe the fetus in detail, including a description of its location in the uterus, its size and the appearance of any external members of internal organs. In addition, physicians must let patients hear the fetal heartbeat, if audible.

The Supreme Court’s decision fell on the last day in office for Governor Matt Bevin, an anti-abortion Republican, who signed the bill into law.

After the law was struck down for violating the constitutional right to freedom of speech, the federal appeals court in Cincinnati upheld it in April. In his decision Judge John Bush wrote:

“The information conveyed by an ultrasound image, its description and the audible beating fetal heart gives a patient a greater knowledge of the unborn life inside her. This also inherently provides the patient with more knowledge about the effect of an abortion procedure: it shows her what or whom she is consenting to terminate.”

The American Civil Liberties Union challenged that ruling on behalf of Kentucky’s last remaining abortion clinic, EMW Women’s Surgical Center, in Louisville, on the grounds that it violated physicians’ freedom of speech.

In refusing to review the appeal, the justices did not comment.

Support Aleteia!

Enjoying your time on Aleteia?

Articles like these are sponsored free for every Catholic through the support of generous readers just like you.

Thanks to their partnership in our mission, we reach more than 20 million unique users per month!

Help us continue to bring the Gospel to people everywhere through uplifting and transformative Catholic news, stories, spirituality, and more.

Support Aleteia with a gift today!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...

Entrust your prayer intentions to our network of monasteries

Top 10
See More
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.