POPE LEO XIV
Subscribe to our free daily newsletter
The Catholic Church’s teaching on the Holy Spirit’s role in papal elections is often misunderstood — and frequently conflated with the dogma of papal infallibility.
While many assume that divine intervention must directly determine who becomes pope, the Church’s actual teaching is far more nuanced — and profoundly human.
What is papal infallibility?
Papal infallibility, defined formally in 1870 during the First Vatican Council, does not mean that the pope is always right or sinless. It is a narrowly defined charism.
According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church (§891), the pope is preserved from error only when he solemnly proclaims, by a definitive act, a doctrine pertaining to faith or morals. This does not apply to personal opinions, disciplinary decisions, or even most papal teachings.
The idea is not that the pope becomes a flawless oracle, but that, in very specific moments, the Holy Spirit protects the Church from being led astray.
So, does the Holy Spirit choose the pope?
That question was posed directly to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger — later Pope Benedict XVI — in a 1997 interview with Bavarian television. In an interview with Die Tagespost, conclave specialist Stefan von Kempis summarizes Ratzinger's answer:
Before his election as Pope, Joseph Ratzinger once said that the Holy Spirit doesn't sit in the Sistine Chapel and choose someone. The role of the Holy Spirit should be understood as much more “flexible”: Even if the wrong candidate is chosen—and that has happened throughout Church history—the Holy Spirit doesn't abandon his Church, but rather guides it broadly in the right direction. I find that somewhat comforting coming from a man who himself became the successor of Peter.
In other words, the conclave is not a mystical lightning strike. The cardinals pray, discern, and vote. The Holy Spirit is invoked, but the process remains deeply human — subject to politics, personality, and persuasion.
That's how the Holy Spirit acts in us, too
This echoes the broader Christian understanding of divine providence: God respects human freedom.
He may offer wisdom and grace, but does not override free will. The Spirit’s influence is more suggestive than coercive — more whisper than command.
Prayer is not magic
The temptation to treat prayer as a tool for control is widespread. We ask God for specific outcomes, and sometimes subconsciously treat him as a guarantor of our preferences. But prayer is not about bending divine will to ours. It is, as Pope Benedict described, about surrender — an invitation to see with God’s eyes, not to force His hand.
That’s especially true in papal conclaves. Though the process begins and ends with prayer, the machinery in between is often a tangle of experiences, hopes, and conflicting visions for the Church. The Spirit is present, but not as a commander.
God’s faithfulness in human history
Despite the flaws in some papal elections — and even in some popes — the Church trusts that Christ’s promise to Peter holds firm: “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). This does not guarantee perfection, but it does promise perseverance.
As Church history shows — from schisms to scandals — God does not abandon His people, even when they make poor choices. He permits failure, but never lets failure have the last word.
So, while the Holy Spirit may not “choose” the pope in a deterministic way, He is never absent. His grace is present in the prayers of the faithful and the conscience of the electors. And through the unpredictable tangle of human freedom, God still brings about His purposes.
