Aleteia logoAleteia logo
Monday 02 August |
Saint of the Day: St. Peter Julian Eymard
home iconNews
line break icon

Obama Administration ‘Overreached’ With HHS Mandate, Says University Board Member

Peter Souza

Kelly Conroy - published on 12/03/13 - updated on 06/08/17

William McGurn, a board member at Ave Maria University, recently commented on the Obama administration's "overreaching" HHS Mandate.

The HHS mandate draws an “exemption so narrow that Jesus Christ himself wouldn’t qualify,” according to William McGurn, a board member at Ave Maria University, in a recent commentary for The New York Post.

McGurn said that it has always been clear that some religious nonprofits would protest the mandate because it would force them to violate their beliefs and provide employee health insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization.

Ave Maria University and Belmont Abbey College, which are both recommended in The Newman Guide, are currently suing the Obama Administration over the HHS mandate.

What hasn’t always been so clear, according to McGurn, is that for-profit companies like Hobby Lobby, which is run by a Christian family, would be suing the government as well. Catholic Education Daily recently reported that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two combined arguments challenging the HHS mandate.

For McGurn, the question to be decided is: “Does a business owner forfeit his faith at the price of doing business?”  His commentary shares that fully half of the lawsuits filed against the HHS mandate come from for-profit companies.

One of the key voters on the issue will likely be Chief Justice John Roberts. McGurn notes how Roberts has voted differently on two similar issues in the past. He found the individual HHS mandate constitutional, but he argued that churches should have the right to choose their own ministers in the Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Supreme Court decision.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, although not absolute, is supposed to prevent laws that substantially burden a person’s free exercise of religion, and requires “government’s interests to be compelling and the means chosen the least restrictive,” McGurn wrote in the Post.

“In other words, once again the Obama administration has overreached,” stated McGurn.

Originally published by The Cardinal Newman Society's Catholic Education Daily on 2 December 2013.

Support Aleteia!

If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.

Here are some numbers:

  • 20 million users around the world read every month
  • Aleteia is published every day in seven languages: English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
  • Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
  • Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
  • Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
  • We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)

As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.

Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!

Daily prayer
And today we celebrate...

Top 10
Cerith Gardiner
Simone Biles leaves the Olympics with an important lesson for her...
Ignacio María Doñoro
Francisco Veneto
The military chaplain who pretended to be a criminal to rescue a ...
Cerith Gardiner
Gold-winning Filipina Olympian shares her Miraculous Medal for th...
Theresa Civantos Barber
The one thing we all should do before this summer ends
Zelda Caldwell
German women’s gymnastics teams modest dress protests sport’s ...
Violeta Tejera
Carlo Acutis’ first stained glass window in jeans and sneak...
Zelda Caldwell
World-record winning gymnast Simone Biles leans on her Catholic f...
See More
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.