Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here

More from Aleteia

Not Prepared to Donate?

Here are 5 ways you can still help Aleteia:

  1. Pray for our team and the success of our mission
  2. Talk about Aleteia in your parish
  3. Share Aleteia content with friends and family
  4. Turn off your ad blockers when you visit
  5. Subscribe to our free newsletter and read us daily
Thank you!
Team Aleteia

Subscribe

Aleteia

Making Kids Count

Amanda Tipton Photography
Share

How does your state measure up in addressing children's economic well being, healthcare, and education?

Vice-President Hubert Humphrey once said, "The moral test of government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; those who are in the shadows of life; the sick, the needy, and the handicapped.”

Pope Francis echoed that sentiment just last September, when he declared “A population that does not take care of the elderly and of children and the young has no future, because it abuses both its memory and its promise.”

So, how are we doing? On Tuesday, the Annie E. Casey Foundation published the 2014 edition of its annual “Kids Count Data Book,” which tracks our success in taking care of children according to four criteria: economic well being, healthcare, education, and family and community. The Foundation ranks states in each of these categories, and assigns an overall ranking based on those criteria. The Kids Count Data Book is free – you can download it here – and is widely used by policymakers to craft strategies designed to improve the lives of children.

Overall, this year’s report showed some improvements, but there were also important indicators of stasis and even regress, which ought to be taken as early warning signs of growing social inequality. That was particularly true in the South and Southwest, regions that together shared the bottom 15 state rankings for overall child well being. The lowest five states overall were Arizona, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico and Mississippi (50). The top states overall were clustered in New England and the Midwest: Massachusetts (1), Vermont, Iowa, New Hampshire and Minnesota.

According to the study, the official child poverty rate in the United States held steady at about 23%, or 16.5 million. That number is higher than the more comprehensive Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which takes into account public assistance programs ranging from food stamps and Section 8 housing to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Using the SPM as the measure, the child poverty rate was pegged at 17%, which is about the same as it was five years ago. Three of four poverty indicators were worse than a decade ago – no doubt a legacy of the sluggish recovery following the Great Recession – but the 2014 numbers were up slightly over 2013, which tracks with the recent modest recovery.

The four criteria for education used in the study were: children not attending preschool, fourth graders not proficient in reading, eighth graders not proficient in reading, and high school students not graduating. Trends for all four of these markers were positive, as they have been for the last decade or so. Notably, pre-school attendance by 3- and 4-year-olds is up significantly, an important sign of future educational success, and reading levels have improved across all demographic categories, including race and income.

The results were equally positive in healthcare. More children had health insurance, the child death rate was lower, and fewer teenagers were addicted to drugs and alcohol than ten years ago. The number of low-birth weight babies continued to be high, the only health indicator that has actually worsened since the Foundation began publishing their Data Book in 1990. According to the study, multiple factors contribute to low birth weight, including smoking, poor nutrition, stress, infections, and poverty. African-American babies were twice as likely as white children to be born with low birth weights. The mortality rate among African-American children was also higher than for other groups, but in a piece of good news black teens were less likely than the general population to be addicted to drugs and alcohol.

Pages: 1 2

Tags:
Parenting
Newsletter
Get Aleteia delivered to your inbox. Subscribe here.
Aleteia offers you this space to comment on articles. This space should always reflect Aleteia values.
[See Comment Policy]