Linking human rights with trade is not a utopian dream.
(You can watch Felber’s talk at the NESI Forum on reshaping global trade for the common good here.)
For Felber, neoliberal ideology has manipulated the concept of freedom and used it for its own interests. “Who can be against free trade, the free market economy, the free circulation of capital or free enterprise?” asks the author. He argues that we have to look at the current trade panorama from an ethics perspective, and suggests several measures to that end:
- Full implementation of human rights, sustainable development, a good life for all, or even the common good. Felber emphasizes that “trade should serve human rights and the fundamental values of a democratic society, because that is its correct place. That’s how it fulfills its function and obtains legitimacy.”
- Trade must be understood as a means, not as an end: He argues that economic freedoms are only instrumental freedoms and that they are at the service of superior values that should not be endangered.
- The United Nations is a context for making global trade more ethical: We need global trade rules in line with the goals of the United Nations. In fact, at the moment, no government has considered the idea of measuring a trade treaty’s impact on well-being.
- The UN should be the seat of international economic development. Many of the agreements, programs, and international declarations that could contribute to ethical world trade already exist; it’s just that they are not integrated into the trade system.
- We must bet on regulatory cooperation between states in the field of human rights, labor law, taxation, cultural diversity, climate protection, and sustainable development goals to create an ethical UN trade zone protected from those who do not ratify or respect international law.
- It would be positive to link access to the international market to the results of the balance of the common good: that is, the greater the ethical results, the more access to the free market.
After historically analyzing the context and clarifying the causes and consequences of the current trade situation, the publication calls for a reasonable form of exchange that avoids the extremes of both protectionism and unrestricted free trade.
If you’re reading this article, it’s thanks to the generosity of people like you, who have made Aleteia possible.
Here are some numbers:
- 20 million users around the world read Aleteia.org every month
- Aleteia is published every day in eight languages: English, French, Arabic, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Slovenian
- Each month, readers view more than 50 million pages
- Nearly 4 million people follow Aleteia on social media
- Each month, we publish 2,450 articles and around 40 videos
- We have 60 full time staff and approximately 400 collaborators (writers, translators, photographers, etc.)
As you can imagine, these numbers represent a lot of work. We need you.
Support Aleteia with as little as $1. It only takes a minute. Thank you!