All the water features and paint in the world won't change the reality
Ms. Brown talks about her decision to collaborate with the owner of the only abortion clinic in Mississippi: “it was so glaringly obvious that an architect and artists needed to be involved” and yet —
The problem is, of course, that this Jackson, MS clinic is still a place where innocent children are killed. Choose all the perky and soothing hues you like, there’s not enough paint in the world to make clients feel “upbeat” about why they’re there.
Changing the environment of clinics is just one of the latest strategies of abortion advocates to dispel the shame surrounding abortion and make it seem like a normal (and empowering!) event in the lives of women. In Brown’s quest to make that a reality, she seems to assume that making abortion clinics “beautiful” will alter the truth of what takes place inside them.
As a post abortive woman, and as someone who has worked with thousands of other women who have suffered as a consequence of abortion, I find this disingenuous. Brown plans, for example, an environment of “lush flora and vegetation and inflatable and interactive sound barriers that add an element of playfulness to an often tense and confrontational zone.”
The “tense” and “confrontational” part is right. Entrances to clinics are, ipso facto, tense places. Most clients are conflicted or grimly determined; no client I’ve seen has entered a clinic with a smile on her face and a song in her heart.
As for an “element of playfulness,” inflatable things, lush vegetation and splashing water may be fun in another setting, but gurgling water will never replace the sound made by the vacuum aspirator that plays in continuous loop in the minds of so many post abortive women, year after year after year.
The article tells us that the “walls of the space can be playful, beautiful, functional and safe all at once.” Safe for whom, exactly? At best, exterior architectural and design upgrades can camouflage the reality of the abortion experience for first-time clients and the public. But they can never alter the truth of the lived experience—safe for neither mom nor baby.
Commenting on the interior layout of the many clinics she visited, Brown noted: “the ones that were so great were the ones that really thought about the entrance sequence and what a patient and her support group or partner or friends who come with her would experience when they enter and have to engage with the reception” because “what you encounter when you first walk in really sets the tone for what that experience will be like.” Is it possible Ms. Brown is so oblivious to reality as to think that natural light and comfy chairs are going to “set the tone” for what happens in the “procedure” rooms?
Brown’s highest praise went to this simple, but “thoughtful” innovation:
Since you are here…
…we’d like to have one more word with you. We are excited to report that Aleteia’s readership is growing at a rapid rate, world-wide! Our team proves its mission every day by providing high-quality content that informs and inspires a Christian life. But quality journalism has a cost and it’s more than ads can cover. We want our articles to be accessible to everyone, free of charge, but we need your help. To continue our efforts to nourish and inspire our Catholic family, your support is invaluable. Become an Aleteia Patron today for as little as $3 a month. May we count on you?